How would Americans react to food shortages?

The U.S. food supply chain, often perceived as robust and unshakeable, is far more fragile than many realize. Supermarkets typically hold only a three-day inventory of food. This revelation has raised concerns about what might happen if the food supply were to be disrupted.

The “just-in-time” nature of the food supply chain means that stores receive frequent shipments to keep shelves stocked, minimizing storage costs and reducing waste. However, this efficiency comes with significant risks. If any link in the chain — ranging from farms to processing plants to transportation networks — experiences a disruption, the impact can be felt almost immediately in grocery stores.

A disruption could stem from various sources. Natural disasters like hurricanes or earthquakes can devastate local supplies and cripple transportation routes. Even more insidious are the potential impacts of a major cyberattack or a pandemic resurgence. During the COVID-19 pandemic, for example, labor shortages at every level — from farm workers to truck drivers — led to noticeable gaps on supermarket shelves and soaring prices.

Jamie Lutz from the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) points out that the pandemic caused a significant strain on the supply chain. Increased demand from consumers, who turned to home cooking during lockdowns, combined with labor shortages due to illness, exacerbated the situation. The result was a sharp rise in food prices, making it harder for families to afford basic necessities.

Toby Hemenway, an expert on food security, explains that while the food system is indeed complex and adaptive, it’s also highly interdependent. This interdependence means that a disruption in one area can cascade through the system, causing broader impacts. He suggests that localizing food production and diversifying supply chains could help mitigate some of these risks. Hemenway argues that storing vast amounts of food in urban areas is less effective than ensuring a steady flow of goods through a resilient and flexible supply chain.

If a severe disruption were to occur, supermarkets could run out of food in just a few days. This would lead to panic buying and hoarding, further exacerbating shortages. Vulnerable populations, such as those relying on Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits, would be particularly hard hit. The federal government attempted to address these vulnerabilities by temporarily increasing SNAP benefits during the pandemic, but these measures are short-term solutions to a long-term problem.

While the U.S. food supply chain is designed for efficiency, its lack of redundancy makes it vulnerable to disruptions. Preparing for these potential crises involves not only improving the resilience of the supply chain but also encouraging local food production and ensuring that all communities have access to emergency supplies. The complexity of the system requires comprehensive strategies to protect against the myriad threats that could lead to empty shelves and widespread hunger.

DO YOU WANT TO KNOW MORE?

The state of grocery in North America

Feeding America in a time of crisis

High prices, empty shelves

Fear and the three-day food supply

Why smartphones fail as true emergency tools

My CCRadio Solar will be a great resource in an emergency. In the meantime, the radio is a stellar performer on AM, FM, and NOAA Weather Radio.

Every week, I check the power level on my CCradio Solar to ensure its battery is charged.

Just in case.

We live in an era dominated by smartphones. These pocket-sized devices have transformed our lives in countless ways, granting us unparalleled connectivity and access to information. But while smartphones are immensely versatile tools, a smartphone is not an emergency radio.

“But I can access any news site or weather app from my phone,” you might argue. Under normal circumstances, your smartphone can inform you about global news, local incidents, and upcoming weather conditions. In short-lived emergencies, such as power outages or brief network disruptions, a smartphone can be a lifeline, giving you essential updates.

However, the value and utility of a dedicated emergency radio, especially one that can receive AM, FM, and weather service broadcasts, should never be underestimated.

Here’s why:

1. Battery Longevity: An emergency radio is built to last. Many models have hand-crank or solar power options, ensuring they remain functional even when electricity sources are compromised. Smartphones drain batteries rapidly with their myriad applications and features. In prolonged emergencies, a dead smartphone is of no use.

2. Network Dependence: Smartphones rely heavily on cellular or Wi-Fi networks. These networks can be overloaded or down in disasters, rendering smartphones useless for gathering information. An emergency radio operates independently of these networks, directly receiving broadcasts to keep you informed.

3. Specificity of Broadcasts: Weather service broadcasts on emergency radios provide specialized information tailored for emergencies, including storm tracks, evacuation routes, and shelter locations. This targeted information might not be readily available on general news sites or apps.

4. Durability: Emergency radios are often built with rugged designs to withstand adverse conditions. Smartphones are generally more fragile, susceptible to water damage, and not designed to endure extreme conditions.

While smartphones are indispensable tools in our modern lives, they cannot replace the tried-and-true reliability of a dedicated emergency radio. It’s always wise to invest in an inexpensive emergency radio, ensuring you have a dependable source of information when it matters most. In an emergency, being well-informed can make all the difference.

DO YOU WANT TO KNOW MORE?

Todderbert reviews the CCRadio Solar as well as many other emergency radios.

Farpoint Farms explains three types of radios you need right now.

Exploring dystopia: Does real beat supernatural?

Midjourney-created faux photo shows ruggedly handsome U.S. Army sergeant troubled by what he sees happening at a FEMA security checkpoint in Colorado.
Midjourney helps authjors create compelling photorealistic illustrations.

Many opportunities have opened up in today’s rapidly evolving technological landscape, especially in storytelling.

I’ve traditionally relied on words to tell stories and painted pictures with linguistic artistry. However, I now find myself captivated by the possibility of an innovative form of storytelling that combines the power of words and the allure of visuals.

I’m thinking about creating a dystopian series.

Why?

First, I enjoy the genre. It’s as simple as that.

Second, part of my affinity for dystopian narratives stems from their popularity, a phenomenon that rivals, or perhaps even surpasses, the cultural fascination with zombie and vampire sagas.

A peculiar allure in dystopian stories captivates audiences on a profound level. These narratives, with their grim yet thought-provoking depictions of the future, are compelling in their ability to entertain and pose crucial questions about society, humanity, and our collective future.

In contrast to the fantastical elements of vampire and zombie lore, the dystopian genre is grounded in a stark, often chilling, potential reality. This potential for plausibility contributes to their widespread appeal and my fascination.

The amalgamation of evocative words and realistic images will only amplify these dystopian tales’ compelling nature.

The advent of Midjourney sparked my imagination. This AI bot offers the ability to create astonishingly realistic imagery, which could be a powerful tool for breathing life into the desolate futures I craft.

The thought of generating visual landscapes to go along with my narratives is exhilarating. I envision a book where the words and images are intertwined, exploring a sorrowful future world. The text would narrate the struggles, while the illustrations would lend actual shape to that narrative.

I’ve already begun experimenting with Midjourney, building a tableau of the future. I’ve included some early idea images.

What are your thoughts about this? It is a hybrid book containing narratives and visuals set in a dystopian future.

Does it resonate with you?

Midjourney-created faux photo shows a young deputy sheriff and an older rancher talking about why United Nations troops would be in southeastern Colorado.
Do you remember Fotonovels? I always liked how they handled dialogue.

Midjourney-created faux photo shows a coujty official being arrested by United Nations forces. You can create anything with an AI bot.
The range of characters becomes unlimited, thanks to Midjourney. I feel as if I’m casting a movie.