Lotteries: The get-poor-quick scheme governments love

Fanciful drawing of a pudgy little boy holding a lollipop. The boy has a dejected, disappointed look on his face. Meaning: You're a sucker if you play the lottery. Image created by Midjourney.

As a copy editor at a renowned media corporation, I honed an undeniable fascination with words and their potent implications. One phrase that particularly resonated with me is “lottery fever.”

As innocuous as it may sound, this term signifies a societal epidemic concealed beneath a thin layer of harmless amusement.

Every time the jackpot number surges toward unprecedented figures, multitudes find themselves irresistibly drawn to buying a ticket, myself included. But let’s put our reservations aside and dissect the impacts of government-sanctioned lotteries.

At first blush, lotteries seem beneficial. They are touted as significant revenue generators for education, social services, and other public sectors.

However, delve deeper, and a far grimmer picture emerges.

The bulk of lottery sales comes from disadvantaged communities; it is a regressive tax system in disguise. The poorest households spend much of their income on lottery tickets, fueled by an elusive dream of instant wealth. This perpetuates a vicious cycle of poverty, as those who can least afford to gamble are those who play the most.

Government-sanctioned lotteries project an insidious image of gambling as a benign pastime, a legitimate form of entertainment.

But it’s more than buying a ticket and waiting for the draw. It fosters an unhealthy relationship with money, instilling the dangerous belief that prosperity can be reached with minimal effort. This mindset discourages productive work and financial discipline, further disadvantaging those in the lower economic strata.

Studies have also shown that lotteries contribute to problem gambling.

The National Council on Problem Gambling reports that 10-15% of young people have experienced significant gambling-related problems. Not only does this harm individuals and their families, but it also burdens our health and social systems.

Some might argue that lotteries provide funding for beneficial social programs. But is it ethical to fund these initiatives on the backs of those most in need? There must be a better way to support our communities than by exploiting the vulnerabilities of our most disadvantaged citizens.

We should strive to foster an environment that promotes hard work, financial discipline, and realistic paths to success rather than selling pipe dreams.

Instead of endorsing the practice of gambling, we should focus on empowering communities, providing adequate education, promoting affordable housing, and other sustainable measures that would lead to a lasting upliftment of society.

As we navigate these convoluted waters of chance and fate, let’s not forget the actual name of this venture. No amount of euphemistic packaging should mask the truth of what lotteries genuinely are.

Lotteries are not “gaming,” an activity connoting fun, engagement, and skill. They are “gambling,” a practice that implies risk, potential harm, and exploitation of the vulnerable.

The next time the lottery pot swells to massive proportions and the feverish excitement sweeps across the state, step back and reassess the actual cost of that ticket. The gamble is not just financial; it’s societal, too.

And let’s call a spade a spade: It’s gambling, not gaming.

Bonus read: Why it’s not worth it to play the lottery